fort monroe

School Quota Utilization Brief

Training and Doctrine Command

1

Purpose

Provide information on school quota utilizatioi
Identify specific performance trends
Layout potential actions to improve performar

Desired Outcome

Achieve concurrence on a solution
set of actions the Army can take to
improve RC quota utilization

Methodology

'Review overall performance
'Examine performance by school category
'Isolate areas with greatest potential
'Review quarterly performance
'Determine contributing factors
'Recommend solution set

3

Data

'Quarterly Training Utilization Module (QTUI^
'Access through ATRRS website
'Analysis tool for historical training utilizatic
'Does not include all non-conducted classes
'Data is shown as Quotas and Inputs
*Green-Amber-Red status is added for affect

4

Quarterly Training Utilization Module
(QTUM) Categories

IET

NCOES

OES

WOES

AVN

OTHER

AC

BCT

AIT

OSUT

RECLASS

(FTU and

RCBN

not

included

)

PLDC

BNCOC

ANCOC

FSC

BSC

SGMC

OBC

OAC

CAS3

CGSC

woe

WOBC
WO AC
WOSC
WOSSC

IERW

AQC

ADVQUA

L

FUNC

ASI

SQI

RC

RECLASS

PLDC

BNCOC

ANCOC

FSC

BSC

CAS3

CGSC

AQC

FUNC

ASI

SQI

ARRTC

PEC

5

FY01 Quota Utilization Summary
Macro Overview

90-100% □
80-89% □

ACTIVE

USAR

ARNG

Total

<79% M

lfrpu^^wota|s

School

s

97% f

322, 562/332, J
55

85% f

46,542/54,756*

91% |

54,787/60,259

95% f

423, 891/447, J
70

RC

School

s

87% ^

2,585/2,960

f

t

88%

42,517/48,535

t

t

102%

76,021/74,720

I

96% *

121,123/126,2

5 t

Total

97%

325,147/335,7

15

86%

89,059/103,29

1

97%

130,808/134,9

79

95%

545,014/573,9

85

Arrow indicates change from previous year

6

FY01 Quota Utilization by Category

in AC Schools

(unused)
^ 23,332

^ 4,889

^ 1,078

^ 179

^ 428

^ +6,027
4- 23,879

7

90-100% □
80-89% □

ACTIVE

USAR

ARNG

TOTAL

<79% H

liputp^>|tota|s

89%

119,859/134,1

83

86%

33,116/38,325

92%

41,574/45,273

89%

194,449/217,7

81

NCOES

94%

63,534/67,461

79%

1,790/2,270

80%

1,913/2,395

93%

67,237/72,126

OES

96%

10,990/11,392

86%

1,482/1,706

84%

2,322/2,774

93%

14,794/15,872

WOES

97%

2,426/2,501

74%

315/423

100%

993/989

95%

3,734/3,913

AVN

90%

2,339/2,609

72%

101/140

86%

715/834

88%

3,155/3,583

OTHER

108%

123,524/114,6

09

82%

9,738/11,892

91%

7,270/7,994

104%

140,552/134,4

95

TOTAL

97%

322,562/332,7

55

85%

46,542/54,756

91%

54,787/60,259

95%

423,891/447,7

70

Initial Entry Training

Basic Training

FY01 Quarterly Performance

140

□ AC
HUSAR

□ ARNG

lstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

*87% (10,482) of unused quotas are 2 nd &
•Same period FY99 - 12,692 & FYOO - 10,8
•Over forecasted 2 nd & 3 rd Qtr requirement
•Under forecasted 1 st Qtr requirements

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

51,721

45,407

87%

6,314

USAR

17,938

14,803

^ 82%

3,135

ARNG

19,148

16,580

86%

2,568

TOTAL

88,807

76,790

^ 86%

12,017

90-100°/Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

8

Initial Entry Training

Advanced Individual Training

FY01 Quarterly Performance

140

120

100

80jt

60

40

20

0

fL

U

□ AC
HUSAR

□ ARNG

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

•Note shift in BT peak to 2 nd Qtr AIT

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

51,581

49,100

95%

2,481

USAR

17,877

16,113

^90%

1,764

ARNG

17,312

16,211

93%

1,101

TOTAL

86,770

81,424

93%

5,346

90-100 o /Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

9

Initial Entry Training

One Station Unit Training

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

• Performance is dependant upon accessio

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

%FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

26,668

21,975

^82%

4,693

USAR

2,510

2,200

87%

310

ARNG

8,813

8,783

^ 99%

30

TOTAL

37,991

32,958

^ 86%

5,033

90-100 o /Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

10

Non-Commissioned Officer Education System

AC BNCOC

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

* ARNG/USAR requirements are mostly
AGR

•USAR AGRs managed by AR PERSCOM

•ARNG AGRs managed by States

Equivalent Credit policy changing
requirements

FY01 Summary

• Decrease requirements in FY03/04

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

21,104

19,328

^91%

1,776

USAR

1,176

815

C 69%

361

ARNG

1,089

789

J^72%

300

TOTAL

23,369

20,932

^ 89%

2,437

90-100 o /Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

11

Non-Commissioned Officer Education System

AC ANCOC

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

•Same issues as AC BNCOC

•4 th Qtr school in conflict with RC unit ATs

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

13,681

11,647

85%

2,034

USAR

817

658

^ 80%

159

ARNG

1,119

964

86%

155

TOTAL

15,617

13,269

^ 84%

2,348

90-100 o /Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

12

Officer Education System

AC OAC

FY01 Summary

*ARNG has the majority of unused
quotas

•4 year average inputs about 1400
for ARNG

• Requirements continue to increase:
1400 to 1800

• Resident OAC is not a high priority
for most States

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

2,717

2,734

|>^.00%

+ 17

USAR

907

787

W 86%

120

ARNG

1,840

1,275

69%

565

TOTAL

5,464

4,796

^ 87%

668

90-100°/Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

13

FY01 Quota Utilization by Category

in RC Schools

90-100% □
80-89% □

<79% ■

Jiputs/Quotals

ACTIVE

USAR

ARNG

TOTAL

RECLASS

100%

18/0

75%

9,811/13,034

82%

19,356/23,733

79%

29,185/36,767

NCOES

84%

22/26

79%

10,908/13,868

90%

19,430/21,668

85%

30,360/35,562

OES

80%

719/899

114%

3,470/3,056

99%

3,362/3,408

103%

7,551/7,363

AVN

100%

1/1

100%

0/0

99%

286/289

99%

287/290

OTHER

90%

1,825/2,034

99%

18,328/18,577

131%

33,587/25,622

116%

53,740/46,233

TOTAL

87%

2,585/2,960

88%

42,517/48,535

102%

76,021/74,720

96%

121,123/126,2

15

(unused)

7,582

5,202
+ 188
3

7,508

5,092

14

MOSO Reclassification

Phase I IDT

FY01 Quarterly Performance

120

100

80

60

40 —

□ AC
HUSAR

□ ARNG

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

•Significant decrease in quotas after 1 st Qi
•1 st Qtr: 10,950 Quotas & 8,173 Inputs
•2 nd Qtr: 3,317 Quotas & 2,768 Inputs

•3 rd Qtr improvement is mainly Phase I of :

•18 of 97 QSMs combined total of 3,300
unused quotas

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

0

8

4^ o%

0

USAR

6,612

5,234

^ 79%

1,378

ARNG

10,498

8,598

() 81%

1,900

TOTAL

17,110

13,840

^ 80%

3,270

90-100°/Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

15

MOSO Reclassification

Phase II ADT

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

•Inverse of Phase I

•1 st Qtr: 998 Quotas & 851 Inputs
•4 th Qtr: 8,789 Quotas & 6,809 Inputs

•Requirements are valid - soldiers not get
to training

•15 of 97 QSMs have 50% of unused quote

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

0

10

4^ o%

0

USAR

6,422

4,577

(] 71 ° /o

1,845

ARNG

13,235

10,758

4^ 81%

2,477

TOTAL

19,657

15,345

W 78%

4,312

90-100°/Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

16

Non-Commissioned Officer Education System

RC PLDC

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

•Fewer conflicts for soldiers in Jun thru
Aug

•Trend:

•FY98 - 61%

•FY99 - 69%

•FYOO - 80%

•FY01 - 82%

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

4

0

2 ° %

4

USAR

4,500

3,391

^75%

1,109

ARNG

8,010

6,970

87%

1,040

TOTAL

12,514

10,361

^ 82%

2,153

90-100 o /Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

17

Non-Commissioned Officer Education System

BNCOC Phase I IDT

FY01 Quarterly Performance

□ AC
HUSAR

□ ARNG

lstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

•Trend:

•FY98 - 70%
•FY99 - 76%
•FYOO - 86%
•FY01 - 92%

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

8

6

^75%

2

USAR

2,689

2,323

86%

366

ARNG

4,725

4,541

96%

184

TOTAL

7,422

6,870

^ 92%

552

90-100 o /Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

18

Non-Commissioned Officer Education System

BNCOC Phase II ADT

IstQtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

•Only 800 quotas (15%) in 1 st & 2 nd
Qtrs

•Challenge is in 3 rd & 4 th Qtrs

•Conflicting priorities at small unit
level

•18 of 97 QSMs have 50% of the
unused quotas

FY01 Summary

QUOTA

S

INPUTS

% FILL

UNUSE

D

AC

7

4

2 57%

3

USAR

2,222

1,584

X 71%

638

ARNG

3,244

2,579

2 79%

665

TOTAL

5,473

4,167

W 76%

1,306

90-100°/Q
80-89% □
<79% ■

19

Factors Contributing to Performance

RC in AC Schools

'Challenge with forecasting accessions performance
•TATS-C implementation for ANCOC and BNCOC in TASS
•OAC quotas are centrally managed at NGB
RC in RC Schools

'Classes start primarily once per year

*Non-MOSQ Prior Service accessions after 1 Nov wait for <
'Conflicting priorities for small unit leaders' duty time
'Additional AT/ADT funding shortfall

20

Recommendations

Initial Entry Training

Refine ARM-G/R forecasting model

•NGB/OCAR/DA G1

•Use of historical averages in NPS
accessions and inputs for BCT, AIT and
OSUT

•Expected outcome would be at least a
50% (4,450) reduction of unused quotas
for the RC

21

Recommendations

(continued)

Initial Entry Training

Increase seat reservation cut off from 30
days to at least 45 days allowing open
use of available quotas to any
component

*DA Gl/Accessions Command

'Improve the components ability to fill
available unused seats

22

Recommendations

(continued)

Initial Entry Training

Develop incentive for IET attendance in
non-surge period

*NGB/OCAR/ Accessions Command/DA G1

•Quick-ship bonus will provide a sales
tool for Recruiting force to input new
enlistments in the “bath tub" months

•Supports reduction in summer surge

23

Recommendations

(continued)

Reclassification Training

Accountability for not achieving DMOSQ
within 24 months of accession

•DA G1

•Change to AR 614-200 (Enlisted
Assignments) - soldiers non-DMOSQ for
more than 24 months will be processed
for separation

•Increase use of available Reclass 24

Recommendations

(continued)

Reclassification Training

DMOSQ a prerequisite to attending
Annual Training with unit (FORSCOM)

•DA G3/FORSCOM

•Change AR 350-41 (Unit Training) and
FORSCOM/ARNG/USAR 350-2 (Reserve
Training) to include Annual Training
attendance policy

25

Recommendations

(continued)

Reclassification Training

Increase funding for student and
instructor pay and travel

•DA G3

•Need additional allocation of $52
million to get soldiers to training and
train the load

26

Recommendations

(continued)

Non Commissioned Officer Education
System

Significantly reduce RC ANCOC/BNCOC
requirements in AC schools following
TATS-C implementation

•NGB/USARC

•Zero-out requirements at TRAP #51, 2 nd
Qtr FY03

27

Recommendations

(continued)

Non Commissioned Officer Education
System

Re-look conditional promotions for
completion of Phase I BNCOC

* NGB/OCAR/DA G1

'Change AR 140-158 removing authority
to promote upon completion of Phase I

'Incentive for soldiers to complete
Phase II ASAP increasing quota fill rate 28

Recommendations

(continued)

Officer Education System
Decentralize management of OAC quotas

•NGB

'Assumption is the requirements are
valid

'Make States accountable for quota fill
rate resulting in an increase from 69% to
90% (+381) 29

Greatest Potential for Improvement

COMMAND

COMMAN
D SIZE

FY01 UNUSED
QUOTAS

FY01 QUOTA
FILL

RATE B

3 YEAR
AVERAGE

NY ARNG

11. 8K

543

68% ^

77 %

70 th RSC

4.7K

268

72% ^

66%

96 th RSC

5.7K

379

73% ^

69%

90 th RSC

17K

791

74% ^

72%

77 th RSC

10.2K

624

74% !

75%

VT ARNG

3K

220

74%

88%

VA ARNG

7.5K

444

75% *

78%

94 th RSC

6.2K

251

190/0 X

75%

WV ARNG

4K

231

80%

77%

88 th RSC

22. IK

895

80% ^

79%

81 st RSC

29. 7K

849

84% J

77%

OK ARNG

7.3K

265

85% T

84%

•Arrow indicates change from previous year

•Commands with the most unused quotas and a fill rate of 85% or less

30

QUESTIONS

Training and Doctrine Command

31

Individual Training Management Life Cycle

• Linkage of TASS CoC/NTCC/IT CoC
•Announce FY03 schedule at NTCC/
•Draft ITMLC/AR 350-10

/ i-16 Oct, SMD1
5-9 Aug, NTCC
10-14 Jun, "" Reg A
3-7 Jun, "" Reg D
28-31 May, "" Reg F
20-23 May, "" Reg G
13-17 May, "" Reg C
6-10 May, RTCC/WTRAP Reg E
/ 29 Apr-3May, RTCCAVTRAP Reg B
11-14 Feb, ITSW

32

TASS Integration Conference

•AAR published /

•Conf Jun & Dec w/ VTC Mar & Aug/^

•Role of the T-XI in QAO

•Addressing T-XI admin issues'"'^ 4-5 Dec (TBD) C

y/ Sep MOI for Dec C<

Aug 4 th Qtr VTC
z' May MOI for Aug VTC
y/ 26-27 June (TBD) Conferen
Apr Location & Agenda for Jui
March 2 nd Qtr VTC
y/ S: 22 February Publish Agenda
S: 8 February VTC Announcement
10 December Published AAR
/ 28-29 November TASS Integration Conferen

33

TRADOC RC GO Conference

•Issue feedback with invitation

•Focus more on future

• Sustain breakout/backbrief forjtfat

•Include RSC Commanders /

X Jan 03 Conf Invite

1 Sep 02 Conf AAR
/X 23 Aug 02 Summarize ta
^X 22-23 Aug 02 RC GO Confe:
>X Jul 02 IPR with CG
X^ May 02 RAH to CG
Apr 02 IPR with DCST
>X Mar 02 Draft Theme and Agenda
j an 02 FY02 Conference Invitation
X^ 16-17 01 Aug RC GO Conference

34

TASS ISSUE TRACKING

BRIEFING TO TIE DIRECTORS

13 Feb 02

35

TASS ISSUE TRACKING

•Need a closed-loop system

• Easy access for the end user
•On-demand report of open and closed issues
•TASS Website menu pick

• Low maintenance inputs and updates

• Single point of entry for all issues

• Screening for validity and completeness

36

37

YES

EMAIL

ON DEMAND REPORTS

TASS ISSUE FEEDBACK

STAFF WORK

TASK

TRACKER

38

ROAD AHEAD

• Project a solution by end of May 02
•Process - SOP

• System

•Interim fix:

•Excel spreadsheet

• FTP site from TASS website
•Consolidate all known "issues"
•Validate for completeness

•TIEs help in communicating to RAC/RECs

39